Panentheism and classical theism.Comments on the basis of Jacek Wojtysiak's criticism of Józef Życiński's position

Panentheism and classical theism. Comments on the basis of Jacek Wojtysiak’s criticism Józef Życiński’s position The article was inspired by tenth anniversary death Archbishop Życiński containing polemic with his panentheism published Wojtysiak. Wojtysiak claims that essence theism is thesis about existential selfsufficiency God resulting asymmetry causal relationship world, which consists in fact can exert influence but world cannot this way. Since contradicts thesis, according to Wojtysiak, not at all. I do agree judgment, what calls ‘theism’ call ‘classical theism’. Both constitute legitimate versions Ishow version proposed entangled serious difficulties. One them cosmological level it harmonizes best occasionalism, is, full theological determinism. Another one connected t impassible, deprives him possibility fulfilling these pro-religious functions, are crucial for Christianity, such as God’s experiential involvement history world. propose recognition divine passibility be minimum condition any or similar it. Meeting does require rejection classically understood immutability, omnipotence creation ex nihilo, conducive revision notions. point out revisions were incomparably smaller than those Whitehead especially Hartshorne, still they treated a minor supplement They version neoclassical theism, much better philosophical Christianity.